BARKAT ALI & ANR. versus BADRI NARAIN (D) BY LRS.

BARKAT ALI & ANR. versus BADRI NARAIN (D) BY LRS.

Once the preliminary stage under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC culminates and parties do not raise objections, the order operates as a decree. Subsequent objections cannot be entertained unless the order is appealed and set aside or modified; constructive res judicata bars raising objections at later stages.

Parties
Appellant: Barkat Ali & Anr.; Respondent: Badri Narain (D) by LRs.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
06 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Decision on Special Appeal Under Section 18 of Rajasthan High Court Ordinance Against Learned Single Judge Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Execution Proceedings, Res Judicata, Constructive Res Judicata

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barkat Ali & Anr.

Appellant

Badri Narain (D) by LRs.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Decision on Special Appeal Under Section 18 of Rajasthan High Court Ordinance Against Learned Single Judge Order

  1. 1 Whether objections filed after issuance of warrant of attachment by the judgment debtor can be entertained by the Executing Court or are barred by constructive res judicata

Ratio Decidendi

Once the preliminary stage under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC culminates and parties do not raise objections, the order operates as a decree. Subsequent objections cannot be entertained unless the order is appealed and set aside or modified; constructive res judicata bars raising objections at later stages.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • High Court was justified in dismissing the special appeal and confirming the learned Single Judge's decision.
  • The appeal is without merit and is dismissed.