BASHIRUDDIN ASHRAF versus THE STATE OF BIHAR
The requirement for mutawalli to prepare and submit budgets for waqf estates under Section 58 of the Bihar Waqfs Act constitutes reasonable statutory regulation and does not amount to an unreasonable restriction on occupation under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. Imprisonment in default of fine is supported by general criminal law provisions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bashiruddin Ashraf; Respondent: The State of Bihar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 1957
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Patna High Court Judgment and Order Dated January 28, 1954
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Waquf Administration, Mutawalli Duties, Reasonable Restrictions Under Constitution, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bashiruddin Ashraf
Appellant
The State of Bihar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Patna High Court Judgment and Order Dated January 28, 1954
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 58 of Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947, imposes an unreasonable restriction violating Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India
- 2 Whether imposition of imprisonment in default of fine under Section 65 is valid
Ratio Decidendi
The requirement for mutawalli to prepare and submit budgets for waqf estates under Section 58 of the Bihar Waqfs Act constitutes reasonable statutory regulation and does not amount to an unreasonable restriction on occupation under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. Imprisonment in default of fine is supported by general criminal law provisions.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The conviction and sentence are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment