B.B. RAJWANSHI versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
Section 6(4) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is unconstitutional as it confers unfettered, unguided, and uncontrolled powers upon the State Government to remit awards for reconsideration without statutory safeguards, violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
- Parties
- Appellant: B.B. Rajwanshi; Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh; Respondent: Electra (India) Ltd., Meerut
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Constitutional Validity, Industrial Dispute Awards, Quasi Judicial Review, Article 14
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B.B. Rajwanshi
Appellant
State of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent
Electra (India) Ltd., Meerut
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Constitutional validity of sub-section (4) of section 6 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
- 2 Legality of State Government order remitting Labour Court award for reconsideration
Ratio Decidendi
Section 6(4) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is unconstitutional as it confers unfettered, unguided, and uncontrolled powers upon the State Government to remit awards for reconsideration without statutory safeguards, violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Sub-section (4) of section 6 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 declared unconstitutional and struck down.
- Order dated December 5, 1984 remitting award to Labour Court set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment