BEENA R. versus KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

BEENA R. versus KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

The appellant, having produced the Computer Word Processing certificate prior to the written examination and possessing an equivalent qualification approved by the Public Service Commission, fulfilled the requirements under Note 1 of the notification. Thus, she is eligible for appointment as per her rank in the list.

Parties
Appellant: Beena R.; Respondents: Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeals allowed; High Court Judgment set aside
Legal Topics
Appointment, Qualification for Lower Division Typist, KGTE Typewriting, Computer Word Processing
Service Law Appointment Qualification for Lower Division Typist KGTE Typewriting Computer Word Processing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beena R.

Appellant

Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant fulfilled the prescribed qualification of Computer Word Processing as per the notification for appointment as Lower Division Typist.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, having produced the Computer Word Processing certificate prior to the written examination and possessing an equivalent qualification approved by the Public Service Commission, fulfilled the requirements under Note 1 of the notification. Thus, she is eligible for appointment as per her rank in the list.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed; High Court Judgment set aside

Orders

  • Appellant shall be appointed in accordance with her position in the Rank List within three months from the date of receipt of this Judgment.
  • If there is any unlikely delay, the appellant shall be deemed to be in actual service from 01.11.2017.