OM PRAKASH AND ANR. versus JAI PRAKASH
Section 4 of the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 totally bars suits and appeals based on benami transactions; a special leave petition pending before the Supreme Court amounts to an appeal pending for purposes of applying Section 4; no decree can be passed in such suits or appeals after the Act comes into force.
- Parties
- Defendant Appellant No. 1: Om Prakash; Defendant Appellant No. 2: Smt. Satyawati; Plaintiff Respondent: Jai Prakash
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court After Grant of Special Leave
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Benami Transactions, Appellate Procedure, Retrospective Legislation, Bar of Suit During Consolidation Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Om Prakash
Defendant Appellant No. 1
Smt. Satyawati
Defendant Appellant No. 2
Jai Prakash
Plaintiff Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court After Grant of Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a suit based on benami transaction instituted prior to the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 is barred.
- 2 Whether a special leave petition pending before the Supreme Court amounts to an appeal pending for the purpose of Section 4 of the Benami Act.
- 3 Whether a plea under Section 49 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act can be raised in appeal if not pleaded.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 4 of the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 totally bars suits and appeals based on benami transactions; a special leave petition pending before the Supreme Court amounts to an appeal pending for purposes of applying Section 4; no decree can be passed in such suits or appeals after the Act comes into force.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- judgment and decree of the High Court set aside
- suit dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment