BHAGAT RAM SHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Appellant not entitled to pension from Punjab State Public Service Commission prior to amendment of Regulation 8(3) in 1972 and no jurisdiction for relief against Himachal Pradesh for pension under Legislative Assembly Act unless pursued before Himachal Pradesh authorities or High Court.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bhagat Ram Sharma; Respondents: Union of India & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 31.5.1984 in C.w.p. No. 5440 of 1982
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Service Commission Pension, Legislative Assembly Pension, Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhagat Ram Sharma
Appellant
Union of India & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 31.5.1984 in C.w.p. No. 5440 of 1982
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to pension as retired member of Punjab State Public Service Commission under Regulation 8(3)
- 2 Entitlement to pension as member of Legislative Assembly under Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly Act, 1971
- 3 Jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for cause of action outside Punjab & Haryana
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant not entitled to pension from Punjab State Public Service Commission prior to amendment of Regulation 8(3) in 1972 and no jurisdiction for relief against Himachal Pradesh for pension under Legislative Assembly Act unless pursued before Himachal Pradesh authorities or High Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment