BHAGIRATHDAN versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
Entry 6 of the Schedule to the Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 1960 prescribes two distinct requirements for promotion to Deputy Drilling Engineer: (a) diploma in Mechanical Engineering, and (b) five years’ experience of drilling or maintenance of drilling machines. Possession of a higher educational qualification does not substitute for the requirement of practical experience. Appellants failed to establish by averment or evidence that they had the necessary five years' experience at the relevant date, and their belated affidavit could not be accepted.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bhagirathdan; Respondents: State of Rajasthan and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Division Bench Judgment of Rajasthan High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Promotion in Service, Interpretation of Service Rules, Qualifications for Promotion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhagirathdan
Appellant
State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Division Bench Judgment of Rajasthan High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether higher educational qualification (degree) obviates the prescribed practical experience for promotion to Deputy Drilling Engineer under Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 1960
- 2 Whether the appellants had the requisite five years’ experience of drilling or maintenance of drilling machines as required by the rules
Ratio Decidendi
Entry 6 of the Schedule to the Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 1960 prescribes two distinct requirements for promotion to Deputy Drilling Engineer: (a) diploma in Mechanical Engineering, and (b) five years’ experience of drilling or maintenance of drilling machines. Possession of a higher educational qualification does not substitute for the requirement of practical experience. Appellants failed to establish by averment or evidence that they had the necessary five years' experience at the relevant date, and their belated affidavit could not be accepted.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment