BHAGWAT DUTT RISHI versus RAM KUMAR

Appellant was not landlord of premises and tenant before superannuation; therefore, not entitled to special procedure for eviction under s. 13A of the Act.

Parties: Appellant: Bhagwat Dutt Rishi; Respondent: Ram Kumar
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 08 November 1989
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Eviction, Specified Landlord, Public Officer, Superannuation

Landlord Tenant Rent Control Eviction Specified Landlord Public Officer Superannuation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Bhagwat Dutt Rishi

Appellant

Ram Kumar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether appellant is a 'specified landlord' under s. 2(hh) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
2 Whether appellant is entitled to benefit of the special procedure for eviction under s. 13A of the Act

Ratio Decidendi

Appellant was not landlord of premises and tenant before superannuation; therefore, not entitled to special procedure for eviction under s. 13A of the Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

Parties directed to bear their own costs