BHARAT RAM MEENA versus RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JODHPUR AND ORS .

BHARAT RAM MEENA versus RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JODHPUR AND ORS .

The assessment of merit of the appellant was not arbitrary or without factual basis and did not warrant intervention by the writ court; nothing was brought on record to justify quashing the adverse remarks in the Annual Confidential Report.

Parties
Appellant: Bharat Ram Meena; Respondents: Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 January 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Annual Confidential Report, Adverse Remarks, Judicial Review, Writ Jurisdiction, Promotion, Disciplinary Proceedings
Service Law Administrative Law Annual Confidential Report Adverse Remarks Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction Promotion Disciplinary Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bharat Ram Meena

Appellant

Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether adverse remarks in Annual Confidential Report can be quashed in writ jurisdiction
  2. 2 Whether disputed questions of fact warrant intervention by writ court

Ratio Decidendi

The assessment of merit of the appellant was not arbitrary or without factual basis and did not warrant intervention by the writ court; nothing was brought on record to justify quashing the adverse remarks in the Annual Confidential Report.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs