BHARTI CELLULAR LIMITED versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

BHARTI CELLULAR LIMITED versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Appellant, having specifically and unconditionally accepted the Migration Package and given up all disputes relating to the Licence Agreement for the period up to 31 July 1999, cannot agitate such disputes after availing benefits under the package. No legal error was found in Tribunal's directions, and the appeal stands dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Bharti Cellular Limited; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Licence Agreement, Migration Package, Computation of Licence Fee, Interest and Penal Interest, Liquidated Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bharti Cellular Limited

Appellant

Union of India and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal Order

  1. 1 Validity of methodology adopted by Union of India for arriving at number of subscribers for licence fee computation from fourth year
  2. 2 Whether respondent could charge interest on licence fee as demanded in specified letters
  3. 3 Entitlement to benefit of reduction in unit call rate for calculating per subscriber licence fee

Ratio Decidendi

Appellant, having specifically and unconditionally accepted the Migration Package and given up all disputes relating to the Licence Agreement for the period up to 31 July 1999, cannot agitate such disputes after availing benefits under the package. No legal error was found in Tribunal's directions, and the appeal stands dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No reason to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal
  • No legal flaw in the Tribunal's directions for re-working dues along with interest