BHASKAR LAL SHARMA & ANR. versus MONICA & ORS.
Complaint petition contained necessary allegations to prima facie sustain offences under Sections 498A and 406 IPC; trial must proceed to conclusion. Maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. must be executed through statutory remedy; writ petition under Article 32 not maintainable as alternative remedies are available and have been initiated.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bhaskar Lal Sharma; Appellant: Vimla Sharma; Respondent: Monica; Respondent: Vikas Sharma
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Nos. 435 436 of 2014 and W.p. (criminal) No. 101 of 2013 / Appeals and Writ Petition Disposed of by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeals by accused dismissed; writ petition disposed of.
- Legal Topics
- Quashing of Proceedings, Maintenance, Service of Summons, Dowry, Mental Cruelty, Stridhan, Execution of Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhaskar Lal Sharma
Appellant
Vimla Sharma
Appellant
Monica
Respondent
Vikas Sharma
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Nos. 435 436 of 2014 and W.p. (criminal) No. 101 of 2013 / Appeals and Writ Petition Disposed of by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether complaint under Sections 498A and 406 IPC is prima facie maintainable against appellants
- 2 Whether maintenance granted under Section 125 Cr.P.C. can be enforced through Article 32 of Constitution when alternative remedies exist
Ratio Decidendi
Complaint petition contained necessary allegations to prima facie sustain offences under Sections 498A and 406 IPC; trial must proceed to conclusion. Maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. must be executed through statutory remedy; writ petition under Article 32 not maintainable as alternative remedies are available and have been initiated.
Court Disposition
Appeals by accused dismissed; writ petition disposed of.
Orders
- Complaint against appellants to be concluded by trial court expeditiously, within one year from receipt of order.
- Family Court No. 2, Saket, New Delhi directed to pass appropriate final orders in Petition No. M-298/2011 as expeditiously as possible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment