BHOLA NATH VARSHNEY (SINCE DEAD) THROUGH HIS LRS. versus MULK RAJ MADAN
The Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 is not applicable to a building which was less than ten years old at the date of institution of the eviction suit; the Act does not become applicable merely because ten years elapsed during litigation and Section 39 does not apply to suits filed after the Act's commencement.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bhola Nath (since dead) through his LRs.; Respondent: Mulk Raj Madan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment in W.p. No. 14149 of 1985
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Applicability of Rent Act, Exemption Period for New Buildings, Eviction Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhola Nath (since dead) through his LRs.
Appellant
Mulk Raj Madan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment in W.p. No. 14149 of 1985
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 applies to residential premises constructed less than ten years before institution of suit
- 2 Whether statutory period elapsing during litigation makes Act applicable
- 3 Applicability of Section 39 to suit instituted after Act's commencement
Ratio Decidendi
The Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 is not applicable to a building which was less than ten years old at the date of institution of the eviction suit; the Act does not become applicable merely because ten years elapsed during litigation and Section 39 does not apply to suits filed after the Act's commencement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of Allahabad High Court set aside
- Order of Additional District Judge, Moradabad restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment