BHULE RAM versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Market value of acquired land must be determined considering existing geographical situation, advantages, disadvantages, and evidence produced by claimant. Claimant failed to produce evidence to prove claim for higher compensation. In absence of comparability and supporting evidence, no basis to interfere with High...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bhule Ram; Respondent: Union of India & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Assessment, Market Value Determination, Burden of Proof, Belting System
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhule Ram
Appellant
Union of India & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant is entitled to compensation at the rate claimed based on compensation awarded in adjacent villages
- 2 Proper method of determining market value of acquired land
- 3 Burden of proof in claims for higher compensation under Land Acquisition Act
Ratio Decidendi
Market value of acquired land must be determined considering existing geographical situation, advantages, disadvantages, and evidence produced by claimant. Claimant failed to produce evidence to prove claim for higher compensation. In absence of comparability and supporting evidence, no basis to interfere with High Court's award based on appellant's own demand.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed as lacking merit; compensation awarded by High Court stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment