BHUPENDRA versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
The detention order is valid as there was a live link between the detenu’s habitual criminal activities and the date of detention order, and these activities created intense fear and disturbance of public order despite previous preventive actions being ineffective.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bhupendra; Respondent: State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition by High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Preventive Detention, Public Order, Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhupendra
Appellant
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition by High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 was justified on the grounds of maintenance of public order
- 2 Whether there existed a live link between the detenu's activities and the date of detention order
Ratio Decidendi
The detention order is valid as there was a live link between the detenu’s habitual criminal activities and the date of detention order, and these activities created intense fear and disturbance of public order despite previous preventive actions being ineffective.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Detention order upheld
- Petition to quash and set aside detention rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment