BIBI JAIBUNISHA versus JAGDISH PANDIT AND ORS.

BIBI JAIBUNISHA versus JAGDISH PANDIT AND ORS.

The courts below were in error by holding that time was the essence of the contract without specific pleadings or issue, and by finding appellant not ready and willing; the appellant was willing to perform her part and is entitled to specific performance upon payment of Rs. 40,000 within six months.

Parties
Appellant: Bibi Jaibunisha; Respondents: Jagdish Pandit and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
10 February 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Appellate Decree No. 135 of 1982, Patna High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Reconveyance, Time as Essence of Contract, Readiness and Willingness, Limitation
Contract Law Property Law Specific Performance Reconveyance Time as Essence of Contract Readiness and Willingness Limitation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bibi Jaibunisha

Appellant

Jagdish Pandit and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Appellate Decree No. 135 of 1982, Patna High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether time was the essence of the contract in the agreement for reconveyance.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was ready and willing to perform her part of the contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The courts below were in error by holding that time was the essence of the contract without specific pleadings or issue, and by finding appellant not ready and willing; the appellant was willing to perform her part and is entitled to specific performance upon payment of Rs. 40,000 within six months.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appellant to deposit Rs. 40,000 in the trial court within six months.
  • Respondent to produce title deeds and reconvey property.