BIHAR MINES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA
Subsisting mining leases under s. 10 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 are to be treated as continuations of existing leases, with the State Government substituted as lessor, and may be modified to conform with Central mining regulations. Termination by the Controller after 20 years from commencement of the lease conforms to the relevant Central Act and Rules.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bihar Mines Ltd.; Respondent No. 1: Union of India; Respondent No. 2: Government of Bihar; Respondent No. 3: M. K. Ramamurti, D. P. Singh, S. C. Agarwala
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 1966
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed with costs; head lease and sub-leases properly terminated by Controller's orders.
- Legal Topics
- Mining Leases Modification, Land Vesting, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bihar Mines Ltd.
Appellant
Union of India
Respondent No. 1
Government of Bihar
Respondent No. 2
M. K. Ramamurti, D. P. Singh, S. C. Agarwala
Respondent No. 3
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subsisting mining lease under Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 was a new statutory lease or a continuation of the old lease
- 2 Whether the Mining Leases (Modification of Terms) Rules, 1956 and the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 applied to such leases
- 3 Validity of modifications and termination under the Rules and Central Act
Ratio Decidendi
Subsisting mining leases under s. 10 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 are to be treated as continuations of existing leases, with the State Government substituted as lessor, and may be modified to conform with Central mining regulations. Termination by the Controller after 20 years from commencement of the lease conforms to the relevant Central Act and Rules.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed with costs; head lease and sub-leases properly terminated by Controller's orders.
Orders
- Head lease and sub-leases terminated as per Controller's order dated July 1, 1961.
- Appeals dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment