BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD versus M/S. BIJOY MINING COMPANY LTD. AND ORS .
Unless an application is made to the competent authority (Chief Engineer) to investigate erratic supply, the Board is entitled to demand and consumer is obliged to pay the minimum guarantee amount; proportionate deduction to be given if the Board is found responsible after enquiry by the Chief Engineer.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bihar State Electricity Board; Respondents: M/s. Bijoy Mining Company Ltd. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Patna High Court Order Dated 21.9.93 in CWJC No. 2811/1993
- Outcome
- Order of High Court set aside; liberty to consumer to apply to Chief Engineer; Chief Engineer to investigate and grant proportionate deduction if Board responsible; appeal ordered; no costs.
- Legal Topics
- Minimum Guarantee Charges, Erratic Supply, Contractual Obligations, Proportionate Deduction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bihar State Electricity Board
Appellant
M/s. Bijoy Mining Company Ltd. and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Patna High Court Order Dated 21.9.93 in CWJC No. 2811/1993
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Electricity Board can issue minimum guarantee charge bill without proportionate deduction when erratic supply is alleged
- 2 Whether application to the competent authority is required for investigation into erratic supply
Ratio Decidendi
Unless an application is made to the competent authority (Chief Engineer) to investigate erratic supply, the Board is entitled to demand and consumer is obliged to pay the minimum guarantee amount; proportionate deduction to be given if the Board is found responsible after enquiry by the Chief Engineer.
Court Disposition
Order of High Court set aside; liberty to consumer to apply to Chief Engineer; Chief Engineer to investigate and grant proportionate deduction if Board responsible; appeal ordered; no costs.
Orders
- Respondents may make an application within one month to Chief Engineer, Electricity Board.
- Chief Engineer to enquire and decide on proportionate reduction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment