BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS versus DHARAMDEO DAS
The appeal is allowed on the ground that promotion takes effect from the date it is granted and not from the date a vacancy arises; completion of Kal Awadhi only makes an employee eligible to be considered and does not create a vested right to retrospective promotion absent express rule; administrative reduction in sanctioned posts was a valid administrative exigency and the Division Bench erred in directing retrospective promotion to 29.7.1997.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bihar State Electricity Board and Others; Respondent: Dharamdeo Das
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Against Division Bench Judgment Dated 20.10.2011 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in LPA No. 41 of 2008, Arising From Single Judge Order Dated 3.10.2007 in CWJC No. 9611 of 2005
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Promotion, Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Retrospective Promotion, Seniority, Equality of Opportunity, Reservation (scheduled Caste), Kal Awadhi
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bihar State Electricity Board and Others
Appellant
Dharamdeo Das
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Against Division Bench Judgment Dated 20.10.2011 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in LPA No. 41 of 2008, Arising From Single Judge Order Dated 3.10.2007 in CWJC No. 9611 of 2005
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether promotion is to be reckoned from the date it is granted or from the date when a vacancy occurs or when the post is created
- 2 Whether completion of Kal Awadhi (qualifying service) creates a vested right to retrospective promotion
- 3 Scope of the fundamental right to be considered for promotion under Articles 14 and 16(1)
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is allowed on the ground that promotion takes effect from the date it is granted and not from the date a vacancy arises; completion of Kal Awadhi only makes an employee eligible to be considered and does not create a vested right to retrospective promotion absent express rule; administrative reduction in sanctioned posts was a valid administrative exigency and the Division Bench erred in directing retrospective promotion to 29.7.1997.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order dated 20.10.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Patna is set aside
- Order dated 3.10.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge is restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment