BINAY KUMAR SINGH versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

BINAY KUMAR SINGH versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

Appeal dismissed as FIR was properly registered, identification evidence by non-injured witnesses is credible, alibi not established with strict proof, and concurrent findings on reliability of evidence are affirmed.

Parties
Appellant: Bina Y Kumar Singh; Respondent: The State of Bihar; Advocate: Krishna Ballabh Sinha; Advocate: Uday Sinha; Advocate: Kailash Vasdev; Advocate: Pawan Kumar; Advocate: Ranjit Kumar; Advocate: Ms. Anu Mohla; Advocate: Yatish Mohan; Advocate: L.R. Singh; Advocate: Anil Kumar Jha; Advocate: R.P. Singh; Advocate: Ugra Shankar Prasad; Advocate: D. Goburdhan; Advocate: Ms. Pinky Anand
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
31 October 1996
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Decision
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
FIR Requirements, Alibi, Identification of Accused, Credibility of Witnesses, Number of Witnesses, Concurrent Findings, Arson, Unlawful Assembly
Criminal Law FIR Requirements Alibi Identification of Accused Credibility of Witnesses Number of Witnesses Concurrent Findings Arson +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bina Y Kumar Singh

Appellant

The State of Bihar

Respondent

Krishna Ballabh Sinha

Advocate

Uday Sinha

Advocate

Kailash Vasdev

Advocate

Pawan Kumar

Advocate

Ranjit Kumar

Advocate

Ms. Anu Mohla

Advocate

Yatish Mohan

Advocate

L.R. Singh

Advocate

Anil Kumar Jha

Advocate

R.P. Singh

Advocate

Ugra Shankar Prasad

Advocate

D. Goburdhan

Advocate

Ms. Pinky Anand

Advocate

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the FIR was properly registered under Section 154 CrPC
  2. 2 Sufficiency of witness identification in mass attacks
  3. 3 Burden and strictness of proof for alibi

Ratio Decidendi

Appeal dismissed as FIR was properly registered, identification evidence by non-injured witnesses is credible, alibi not established with strict proof, and concurrent findings on reliability of evidence are affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence upheld for all appellants.
  • Bail bonds executed by appellants stand cancelled.