B.N. AGARWALLA versus STATE OF ORISSA
Awards made on the date of commencement of the Arbitration (Orissa Amendment) Act, 1982 (i.e., 26.3.1983), are not awards made 'by the said date' within the meaning of Section 41-A(7); therefore, the arbitrator lacks jurisdiction and all such pending proceedings stand transferred to the Arbitration Tribunal.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: B.N. Agarwalla; Respondent: State of Orissa
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Orissa High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Interpretation of 'by the Said Date', Automatic Transfer of Proceedings, Statutory Amendment Applicability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B.N. Agarwalla
Appellant
State of Orissa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Orissa High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to make the award on 26.3.1983 given the enactment of the Arbitration (Orissa Amendment) Act, 1982 and its effect on pending proceedings
- 2 Construction of the expression 'by the said date' in Section 41-A(7) of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
Awards made on the date of commencement of the Arbitration (Orissa Amendment) Act, 1982 (i.e., 26.3.1983), are not awards made 'by the said date' within the meaning of Section 41-A(7); therefore, the arbitrator lacks jurisdiction and all such pending proceedings stand transferred to the Arbitration Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; award made by the arbitrator on 26.3.1983 held without jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment