MIS. SCIEMED OVERSEAS INC. versus BOC INDIA LIMITED & ORS.
Imposition of costs was justified as the petitioner filed a false or misleading affidavit before the Supreme Court, which by itself is enough to invite adverse reaction, and the statement was not bonafide. There was an alarming increase in the filing of false affidavits, which must be discouraged.
- Parties
- Petitioner: MIS. SCIEMED OVERSEAS INC.; Respondent: BOC INDIA LIMITED; Third Party: Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi (RIMS)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Judgment After Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Imposition of Costs, Filing of False Affidavits, Award of Works Contracts, Judicial Misconduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIS. SCIEMED OVERSEAS INC.
Petitioner
BOC INDIA LIMITED
Respondent
Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi (RIMS)
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Judgment After Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court was correct in imposing costs of Rs. 10 lakhs on the petitioner for filing a false or misleading affidavit in the Supreme Court
- 2 Whether the statement in the affidavit filed by Sciemed was bonafide or a deliberate attempt to mislead the court
- 3 Impact of filing false affidavits before courts
Ratio Decidendi
Imposition of costs was justified as the petitioner filed a false or misleading affidavit before the Supreme Court, which by itself is enough to invite adverse reaction, and the statement was not bonafide. There was an alarming increase in the filing of false affidavits, which must be discouraged.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Petitioner granted six weeks to deposit costs of Rs. 10 lakhs with Jharkhand Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). On deposit, JHALSA should forward the amount to BOC India Limited. Matter to be listed in the High Court after eight weeks for compliance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment