BRAHM PARKASH versus MANBIR SINGH AND OTHERS
A purchaser who is also a mortgagee of other properties of the mortgagor is not excluded from marshalling under section 56 of the Transfer of Property Act. Subrogation may be claimed without an express agreement, and the question of prejudice is a matter of fact; absent any plea or evidence of prejudice, marshalling cannot be denied.
- Parties
- Appellant: Brahm Parkash; Respondents: Manbir Singh and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals / Appeal From Judgment and Decree of Punjab High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Marshalling, Subrogation, Priorities of Mortgagees, Transfer of Property Act Section 56
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brahm Parkash
Appellant
Manbir Singh and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals / Appeal From Judgment and Decree of Punjab High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a purchaser who is also a mortgagee is entitled to marshalling under section 56 of the Transfer of Property Act
- 2 Whether subrogation can be claimed without an express agreement
- 3 Whether marshalling must necessarily prejudice subsequent mortgagees
Ratio Decidendi
A purchaser who is also a mortgagee of other properties of the mortgagor is not excluded from marshalling under section 56 of the Transfer of Property Act. Subrogation may be claimed without an express agreement, and the question of prejudice is a matter of fact; absent any plea or evidence of prejudice, marshalling cannot be denied.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed with costs; one set payable to the executors of the will of Pt. Sham Sunder.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment