BRIJ PAL SHARMA versus GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Interest at 18% per annum is justified on the refunded amount for non-allotment due to scheme cancellation or delay, but no interest is payable for periods when delivery of possession was prevented by a court stay order. Public interest must prevail over private interest for statutory authorities under Article 12.
- Parties
- Appellant: Brij Pal Sharma; Respondent: Ghaziabad Development Authority
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Contempt Petition
- Outcome
- Appeals and contempt petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Refunds for Cancelled Allotment, Damages and Compensation, Article 12 State Action, Public Vs Private Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brij Pal Sharma
Appellant
Ghaziabad Development Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Contempt Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to interest on refunded amounts for non-allotment of plots by Development Authority
- 2 Liability for refund and compensation when plot allotment scheme is cancelled or delayed
- 3 Statutory authority's duty regarding public interest under Article 12
Ratio Decidendi
Interest at 18% per annum is justified on the refunded amount for non-allotment due to scheme cancellation or delay, but no interest is payable for periods when delivery of possession was prevented by a court stay order. Public interest must prevail over private interest for statutory authorities under Article 12.
Court Disposition
Appeals and contempt petition dismissed
Orders
- Refund of deposited amounts to appellants with 18% interest per annum, except for periods when stay order prevented development or construction work.
- Contempt petition closed as not surviving.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment