BRITISH INDIAN CORPORATION LTD. versus MIS RASHTRACO FREIGHT CARRIERS
Section 10 CPC does not apply where the causes of action and the matters in issue in both suits are entirely different, and there is no directly or substantially common issue.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: British Indian Corporation Ltd.; Respondent: Rashtraco Freight Carriers
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Suit Under Section 10 CPC, Carrier's Lien, Recovery of Goods, Injunction
Civil Procedure Stay of Suit Under Section 10 CPC Carrier's Lien Recovery of Goods Injunction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
British Indian Corporation Ltd.
Appellant
Rashtraco Freight Carriers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 10 CPC applies to stay the subsequent suit when the causes of action in both suits are different.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10 CPC does not apply where the causes of action and the matters in issue in both suits are entirely different, and there is no directly or substantially common issue.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The impugned order of the High Court dated 25th May, 1995 is set aside.
- No costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment