BSES LTD. versus M/S. TATA POWER CO. LTD. AND ORS.
The determination of charges for standby facility falls within the Commission's jurisdiction, as such charges are part of tariff determination per Sections 22 and 29 of the Maharashtra Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998. Notices to enhance charges under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, have no legal effect post-1998 Act; only the Commission can approve enhanced tariffs. The procedure adopted by the Commission was improper as quorum and participation requirements were violated; High Court was correct to remit proceedings for de novo consideration.
- Parties
- Appellant: BSES Ltd.; Respondent: M/s Tata Power Co. Ltd.; Respondent: Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Tariff Determination, Standby Charges, Jurisdiction of Regulatory Commission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BSES Ltd.
Appellant
M/s Tata Power Co. Ltd.
Respondent
Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether determination of charges for standby electric supply falls within the jurisdiction of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission under Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998.
- 2 Legal effect of notice to enhance charges under Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 after the enactment of Maharashtra Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998.
- 3 Fairness of procedure adopted by Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission in devising the formula for charges.
Ratio Decidendi
The determination of charges for standby facility falls within the Commission's jurisdiction, as such charges are part of tariff determination per Sections 22 and 29 of the Maharashtra Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998. Notices to enhance charges under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, have no legal effect post-1998 Act; only the Commission can approve enhanced tariffs. The procedure adopted by the Commission was improper as quorum and participation requirements were violated; High Court was correct to remit proceedings for de novo consideration.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission to decide the dispute expeditiously, preferably within three months of presentation of certified copy of this order.
- Commission to adjust liabilities and deposits made under interim arrangement by High Court in final order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment