CCE, LUCKNOW versus M/S. WIMCO LTD.
Tribunal's conclusion that waste/scrap/parings are not excisable was abrupt and lacked detailed factual analysis; matter remitted to Tribunal for reconsideration in light of relevant legal principles and judgments on manufacture and excisability.
- Parties
- Appellant: CCE, Lucknow; Respondent: M/s. Wimco Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Customs Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; matter remitted to Tribunal for fresh consideration; no costs.
- Legal Topics
- Classification of Excisable Goods, Manufacture Definition, Excise Liability on Waste/scrap/parings, Exemption Under Notification No. 89/95
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CCE, Lucknow
Appellant
M/s. Wimco Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Customs Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether waste/scrap/parings generated during manufacture of printed paper board boxes are excisable under sub-heading 4702.90
- 2 Whether charging of duty on such waste/scrap/parings amounts to charging duty on the same product twice
- 3 Whether exemption under Notification No. 89/95 dated 18.5.1995 is available
Ratio Decidendi
Tribunal's conclusion that waste/scrap/parings are not excisable was abrupt and lacked detailed factual analysis; matter remitted to Tribunal for reconsideration in light of relevant legal principles and judgments on manufacture and excisability.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; matter remitted to Tribunal for fresh consideration; no costs.
Orders
- CEGAT order set aside; case remitted for consideration afresh in light of decisions cited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment