CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA versus VIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD. & ORS.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA versus VIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD. & ORS.

Personal guarantees executed by Respondent Directors on 30.8.1974 rendered them liable only for advances made by appellant bank after that date; there being no express assumption of previous liabilities in the guarantee deed, the bank cannot recover prior debts from them.

Parties
Appellant: Central Bank of India; Respondent No.1: Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd.; Respondents No.2 to 4: Directors of Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. (Respondent Nos.2 to 4); Respondent No.5: Respondent No.5; Respondent No.6: Respondent No.6
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Guarantee Liability, Personal Guarantees, Contract Interpretation, Suretyship

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Central Bank of India

Appellant

Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd.

Respondent No.1

Directors of Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. (Respondent Nos.2 to 4)

Respondents No.2 to 4

Respondent No.5

Respondent No.5

Respondent No.6

Respondent No.6

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether personal guarantees by Directors executed on 30.8.1974 cover liabilities incurred by the company prior to that date.

Ratio Decidendi

Personal guarantees executed by Respondent Directors on 30.8.1974 rendered them liable only for advances made by appellant bank after that date; there being no express assumption of previous liabilities in the guarantee deed, the bank cannot recover prior debts from them.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Concurrent findings of courts below affirmed; suit decreed only against respondent company; no costs order.