CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA versus RAM NARAIN

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA versus RAM NARAIN

The Court held that at the time of commission of the offence, Ram Narain was domiciled in what became Pakistan and was not a citizen of India. Subsequent migration and acquisition of Indian citizenship or domicile does not confer retrospective jurisdiction for offences committed prior to migration under Indian Penal...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Central Bank of India Ltd.; Respondent: Ram Narain; Intervener: The State of Punjab
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 October 1954
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Under Article 134(1)(c) From Punjab High Court Decision in Criminal Revision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Indian Penal Code Section 4, Code of Criminal Procedure Section 188, Domicile Definition, Jurisdiction for Offences Committed Outside India
Criminal Law Jurisdiction Nationality/domicile Indian Penal Code Section 4 Code of Criminal Procedure Section 188 Domicile Definition Jurisdiction for Offences Committed Outside India

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Central Bank of India Ltd.

Appellant

Ram Narain

Respondent

The State of Punjab

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Under Article 134(1)(c) From Punjab High Court Decision in Criminal Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an Indian court has jurisdiction to try an offence committed in territory that became Pakistan by a person who later acquired Indian citizenship
  2. 2 Whether subsequent acquisition of Indian citizenship or domicile enables retrospective prosecution for offences committed as a non-citizen

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that at the time of commission of the offence, Ram Narain was domiciled in what became Pakistan and was not a citizen of India. Subsequent migration and acquisition of Indian citizenship or domicile does not confer retrospective jurisdiction for offences committed prior to migration under Indian Penal Code section 4 and Criminal Procedure Code section 188. Therefore, Indian Courts did not have jurisdiction to try Ram Narain for offences committed in Pakistan before his migration.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No jurisdiction to prosecute Ram Narain for offences committed in Pakistan before migration
  • High Court decision affirmed