CENTRAL MINE PLANNING AND DESIGN INSTITUTE LTD. versus RAMU PASI AND ANR.
A casual worker is not covered by the definition of workman under Section 2(n) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and without evidence of employment for the purposes of the employer's trade or business, the claim petition before the Labour Court was not maintainable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Ltd.; Respondent: Ramu Pasi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Patna High Court Decision in M.a. No. 153 of 1992(r), Along With Civil Appeal No. 980 of 2000
- Outcome
- Appeals disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Definition of Workman, Casual Worker Exclusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Ltd.
Appellant
Ramu Pasi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Patna High Court Decision in M.a. No. 153 of 1992(r), Along With Civil Appeal No. 980 of 2000
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a casual worker is covered under the definition of 'workman' for purposes of claiming compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
- 2 Whether the claim petition before the Labour Court was maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi
A casual worker is not covered by the definition of workman under Section 2(n) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and without evidence of employment for the purposes of the employer's trade or business, the claim petition before the Labour Court was not maintainable.
Court Disposition
Appeals disposed of
Orders
- If compensation already paid, it shall not be recovered.
- If compensation not paid, it shall be paid forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment