C.E.S.G: LIML1 TED versus SANDHYA RANI BARIK AND ORS.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's compensation rate as just and reasonable, affirming deductions for largeness and land-locking, but substituted the award and High Court rates of interest for the statutory rates provided under Section 7(2)(a) of the West Bengal Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: C.E.S.C. Limited; Respondents/claimants: Sandhya Rani Barik and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Civil appeals by CESC Ltd. dismissed; cross-appeals by claimants allowed to the extent of modifying the interest rate to the statutory rate; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Land Value, Rate of Compensation, Interest on Compensation, Deductions for Large Tracts, Special Features Affecting Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C.E.S.C. Limited
Appellant
Sandhya Rani Barik and Ors.
Respondents/claimants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the just and reasonable compensation for the acquired land?
- 2 Is the land-locked nature and size of the acquired land relevant to compensation assessment?
- 3 Was the deduction applied by the High Court for largeness and land-locking appropriate?
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's compensation rate as just and reasonable, affirming deductions for largeness and land-locking, but substituted the award and High Court rates of interest for the statutory rates provided under Section 7(2)(a) of the West Bengal Act.
Court Disposition
Civil appeals by CESC Ltd. dismissed; cross-appeals by claimants allowed to the extent of modifying the interest rate to the statutory rate; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The rate of compensation fixed by the High Court (Rs.2.25 lakhs per cottah) is upheld.
- Statutory interest rate (9% per annum for one year from acquisition notice, then 15% per annum) is to replace prior interest awards.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment