CHAND PATEL versus BISMILLAH BEGUM AND ANR.
A marriage by a Muslim man with his wife's sister, while the earlier marriage subsists, is irregular (fasid) and not void (batil) under Muslim law; such marriage subsists until declared void by competent court. Therefore, the wife and child from such a wedlock are entitled to maintenance under s.125 Cr.P.C. until such a declaration is made.
- Parties
- Appellant: Chand Patel; Respondent No.1: Bismillah Begum; Respondent No.2: Taheman Sano
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance, Muslim Personal Law, Unlawful Conjunction, Irregular Marriage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chand Patel
Appellant
Bismillah Begum
Respondent No.1
Taheman Sano
Respondent No.2
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a marriage by a Muslim man with his wife's sister, while the first marriage is subsisting, is void or irregular under Muslim law and whether wife and child from such wedlock may claim maintenance under s.125 Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi
A marriage by a Muslim man with his wife's sister, while the earlier marriage subsists, is irregular (fasid) and not void (batil) under Muslim law; such marriage subsists until declared void by competent court. Therefore, the wife and child from such a wedlock are entitled to maintenance under s.125 Cr.P.C. until such a declaration is made.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay all arrears of maintenance within six months from date of judgment.
- Appellant to continue current maintenance from March 2008 onwards.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment