CHANDER PRAKASH TYAGI versus SHRI BENARSI DAS(DEAD) BY LRS. AND OTHERS
Appellant was guilty of professional misconduct for acting for the opposite party in proceedings involving the same property, breaching fiduciary obligations and violating Regulation 33 of Bar Council of India Rules; disciplinary action of suspension and imposition of costs was justified.
- Parties
- Appellant: Chander Prakash Tyagi; Respondents: Shribenarsi Das (Dead) by LRS. and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of India
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conflict of Interest, Advocate Misconduct, Disciplinary Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chander Prakash Tyagi
Appellant
Shribenarsi Das (Dead) by LRS. and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of India
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant advocate committed professional misconduct by accepting briefs for both sides relating to the same property
- 2 Whether the suspension and costs imposed by the Bar Council of India are justified
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant was guilty of professional misconduct for acting for the opposite party in proceedings involving the same property, breaching fiduciary obligations and violating Regulation 33 of Bar Council of India Rules; disciplinary action of suspension and imposition of costs was justified.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appellant suspended from practice for one year.
- Appellant directed to pay cost of Rs. 2,000, of which Rs. 1,000 to respondent-complainant and Rs. 1,000 to Advocates' Welfare Fund of B.C.I.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment