THE CHIEF SOIL CONSERVATOR PUNJAB AND ORS. versus GURMAIL SINGH
The workman failed to establish that he had worked for more than 240 days in the 12 months preceding termination. Courts below erred in placing the onus on the employer. Considering passage of time and peculiar facts, full and final settlement of Rs.60,000/- is directed without deciding the 'industry' issue.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Chief Soil Conservator Punjab and Ors.; Respondent: Gurmail Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposal
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of with direction to pay Rs.60,000/- in full and final settlement.
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement of Terminated Workman, Onus to Prove Completion of 240 Days, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chief Soil Conservator Punjab and Ors.
Appellant
Gurmail Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the workman had completed 240 days in the preceding 12 months before termination
- 2 On whom lies the onus to prove 240 days of work
- 3 Whether the employer is an 'industry' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Ratio Decidendi
The workman failed to establish that he had worked for more than 240 days in the 12 months preceding termination. Courts below erred in placing the onus on the employer. Considering passage of time and peculiar facts, full and final settlement of Rs.60,000/- is directed without deciding the 'industry' issue.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of with direction to pay Rs.60,000/- in full and final settlement.
Orders
- Respondent to be paid Rs.60,000/- in full and final settlement of his claim.
- No decision on whether the appellant is an industry.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment