SHANTILAL MANGANLAL AND ANR. versus CHUNNILAL RANCHODDAS THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

An application for review which discloses no grounds and is filed only to save limitation is an abuse of the process of the Court and wholly frivolous, and must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Petitioner: Shantilal Manganlal and Another; Respondent: Chunnilal Ranchoddas through LRs. and Others
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 24 July 1984
Procedural Posture: Review Petition / Order on Review Petition After Dismissal of Special Leave Petition
Outcome: Petition dismissed as frivolous and an abuse of process of the Court.
Legal Topics: Special Leave Petition, Review Petition, Abuse of Process

Civil Procedure Special Leave Petition Review Petition Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1

Parties

Shantilal Manganlal and Another

Petitioner

Chunnilal Ranchoddas through LRs. and Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Petition / Order on Review Petition After Dismissal of Special Leave Petition

Legal Issues

1 Whether a review petition can be entertained when filed without any grounds or reasons
2 Whether such petitions constitute abuse of the process of the Court

Ratio Decidendi

An application for review which discloses no grounds and is filed only to save limitation is an abuse of the process of the Court and wholly frivolous, and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed as frivolous and an abuse of process of the Court.

Orders

Application for review dismissed.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.