CIDCO versus VASUDHA GORAKHNATH MANDEVLEKAR
Entries in statutory registers of births and deaths maintained by the relevant authority are admissible evidence of date of birth under Section 35 of the Evidence Act and prevail over school records, especially in absence of contradictory proof from the guardian, and previous corporation records consistently showing the respondent’s date of birth as 2.10.1950 must be accepted.
- Parties
- Appellant: CIDCO; Respondent: Vasudha Gorakhnath Mandevlekar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment Following High Court Writ Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Service Records, Date of Birth Disputes, Admissibility of Public Records, Presumption of Correctness of Statutory Registers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CIDCO
Appellant
Vasudha Gorakhnath Mandevlekar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment Following High Court Writ Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's date of birth is 2.10.1948 or 2.10.1950
- 2 Admissibility and evidentiary value of public records versus school registers
Ratio Decidendi
Entries in statutory registers of births and deaths maintained by the relevant authority are admissible evidence of date of birth under Section 35 of the Evidence Act and prevail over school records, especially in absence of contradictory proof from the guardian, and previous corporation records consistently showing the respondent’s date of birth as 2.10.1950 must be accepted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs assessed at Rs.50,000/-
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment