CITIBANK N.A. versus HITEN P. DALAL & ORS.
The amount payable by way of restitution is to be ascertained using realistic and verifiable market value, specifically the actual sale prices at which the bonds were disposed of by Citibank, rather than assuming the respondent would have retained them till maturity.
- Parties
- Appellant: Citibank N.A.; Respondent: Hiten P. Dalal & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Special Court at Mumbai Under the Special Court (trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Section 144 CPC, Restitution of Money Decree, Market Value Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Citibank N.A.
Appellant
Hiten P. Dalal & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Special Court at Mumbai Under the Special Court (trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper method to ascertain the amount payable by way of restitution under Section 144 CPC when bonds have been sold and are no longer available?
Ratio Decidendi
The amount payable by way of restitution is to be ascertained using realistic and verifiable market value, specifically the actual sale prices at which the bonds were disposed of by Citibank, rather than assuming the respondent would have retained them till maturity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order of the Special Court is set aside.
- The final amount payable to Canfina as on 20.7.2004 is Rs.115,08,98,835/-; after adjustment, Citibank is entitled to refund of Rs.22,14,36,756/- as on 25.4.2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment