COLLECTOR OF AKOLA & ORS. versus RAMCHANDRA & ORS.
The Act authorises requisitioning for any public purpose whether temporary or permanent; the words 'for any public purpose' in section 5(1) are wide enough to include all purposes without limitation as to their nature.
- Parties
- Appellant: Collector, Akola; Respondents: Ramchandra & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 1967
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From Bombay High Court's Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court decision set aside; matter remanded to High Court for determination of remaining issues.
- Legal Topics
- Requisitioning of Land, Power Under Temporary Statutes, Public Purpose, Permanent Versus Temporary Nature of Requisition, Relationship Between Requisition and Acquisition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Collector, Akola
Appellant
Ramchandra & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From Bombay High Court's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bombay Land Requisition Act authorises requisition for permanent public purpose
- 2 Whether requisitioning and acquisition powers can coexist under different statutes
Ratio Decidendi
The Act authorises requisitioning for any public purpose whether temporary or permanent; the words 'for any public purpose' in section 5(1) are wide enough to include all purposes without limitation as to their nature.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court decision set aside; matter remanded to High Court for determination of remaining issues.
Orders
- High Court's order quashing the requisition set aside.
- Matter remanded to High Court for determination of other questions raised in the petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment