COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY versus SWASTIC WOOLLEN (P) LTD. & ORS.
The Tribunal's finding that the goods are 'wool waste' is primarily a question of fact, based on relevant material facts and correct legal principles, especially trade understanding, and is unassailable; the Supreme Court will not interfere on factual determination honestly and bona fide made by Tribunal within jurisdiction even if another view is possible.
- Parties
- Appellant: Collector of Customs, Bombay; Respondent No. 1/importer: Swastic Woollen (P) Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Classification of Imports, Assessment of Customs Duty, Trade Understanding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Collector of Customs, Bombay
Appellant
Swastic Woollen (P) Ltd.
Respondent No. 1/importer
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imported goods are 'wool waste' for exemption under the relevant customs notification
- 2 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in appeals from Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal decisions
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's finding that the goods are 'wool waste' is primarily a question of fact, based on relevant material facts and correct legal principles, especially trade understanding, and is unassailable; the Supreme Court will not interfere on factual determination honestly and bona fide made by Tribunal within jurisdiction even if another view is possible.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals are rejected; no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment