COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus M/S. CLASSIC BINDING INDUSTRIES
After availing deduction for 5 years at 100%, the assessees are only entitled to deduction for remaining 5 years at 25% (or 30% for companies), and not 100%, even if substantial expansion is carried out. There cannot be another initial assessment year within the same 10-year period under s.80-IC.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Commissioner of Income Tax; Respondent: M/s. Classic Binding Industries
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Exemption, Section 80 IC, Substantial Expansion, Assessment Year
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Income Tax
Appellant
M/s. Classic Binding Industries
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an assessee who sets up a new industry under s.80-IC and avails 100% exemption for five years can again claim exemption at 100% for next five years after substantial expansion
Ratio Decidendi
After availing deduction for 5 years at 100%, the assessees are only entitled to deduction for remaining 5 years at 25% (or 30% for companies), and not 100%, even if substantial expansion is carried out. There cannot be another initial assessment year within the same 10-year period under s.80-IC.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- The appeals are allowed; question of law answered in favour of the Revenue; assessees entitled only to deduction at 25% (or 30% for companies) for remaining 5 years after first 5 years at 100%; no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment