CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, KERELA versus M/S. R. V. VISHWANATHAN & ORS.

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, KERELA versus M/S. R. V. VISHWANATHAN & ORS.

The amount of Rs. 2,70,000 transferred by book entries represented a gift of share in the business, not cash, subject to use as partnership capital, and any benefit enjoyed by the deceased was by virtue of his retained one-seventh share in the firm, not by virtue of the gifted share; therefore, the amount is not includible in the estate under section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.

Parties
Appellant: Controller of Estate Duty, Kerala; Respondents: M/s. R. V. Vishwanathan & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 September 1976
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Kerala High Court Judgment in I.t.r. No. 42/68, Decided on 27 10 1970
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Gift Under Estate Duty Act, Partnership Business, Inclusion in Estate of Deceased, Section 10 of Estate Duty Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Controller of Estate Duty, Kerala

Appellant

M/s. R. V. Vishwanathan & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Kerala High Court Judgment in I.t.r. No. 42/68, Decided on 27 10 1970

  1. 1 Whether the sum of Rs. 2,70,000 is includible in the estate of the deceased under section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953

Ratio Decidendi

The amount of Rs. 2,70,000 transferred by book entries represented a gift of share in the business, not cash, subject to use as partnership capital, and any benefit enjoyed by the deceased was by virtue of his retained one-seventh share in the firm, not by virtue of the gifted share; therefore, the amount is not includible in the estate under section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.