DAMADILAL AND OTHERS versus PARASHRAM AND OTHERS

DAMADILAL AND OTHERS versus PARASHRAM AND OTHERS

Under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, statutory tenancy is heritable; thus, legal representatives of deceased tenants may prosecute appeals. Offering rent by cheque constitutes valid tender. The High Court may reverse a lower appellate finding if material evidence was overlooked, as happened with...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Damadilal and Others; Respondent: Parashram and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 May 1976
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Statutory Tenancy, Heritability of Tenancy, Rent Control, Valid Tender of Rent, Substitution of Parties, Bona Fide Requirement, Appellate Jurisdiction
Landlord Tenant Civil Procedure Statutory Tenancy Heritability of Tenancy Rent Control Valid Tender of Rent Substitution of Parties Bona Fide Requirement +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Damadilal and Others

Appellant

Parashram and Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal

  1. 1 Whether statutory tenancy under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 is heritable
  2. 2 Whether tender of rent by cheque is valid under the Act
  3. 3 Whether legal representatives may be substituted for deceased statutory tenants

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, statutory tenancy is heritable; thus, legal representatives of deceased tenants may prosecute appeals. Offering rent by cheque constitutes valid tender. The High Court may reverse a lower appellate finding if material evidence was overlooked, as happened with the claim of bona fide requirement in this case.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs