DAMADILAL AND OTHERS versus PARASHRAM AND OTHERS
Under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, statutory tenancy is heritable; thus, legal representatives of deceased tenants may prosecute appeals. Offering rent by cheque constitutes valid tender. The High Court may reverse a lower appellate finding if material evidence was overlooked, as happened with...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Damadilal and Others; Respondent: Parashram and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Tenancy, Heritability of Tenancy, Rent Control, Valid Tender of Rent, Substitution of Parties, Bona Fide Requirement, Appellate Jurisdiction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damadilal and Others
Appellant
Parashram and Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory tenancy under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 is heritable
- 2 Whether tender of rent by cheque is valid under the Act
- 3 Whether legal representatives may be substituted for deceased statutory tenants
Ratio Decidendi
Under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, statutory tenancy is heritable; thus, legal representatives of deceased tenants may prosecute appeals. Offering rent by cheque constitutes valid tender. The High Court may reverse a lower appellate finding if material evidence was overlooked, as happened with the claim of bona fide requirement in this case.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment