DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION versus K.K.KAR
Where in a contract there is an arbitration clause, the question whether there has been a full and final settlement under the contract is itself a dispute arising 'upon' or 'in relation to' or 'in connection with' the contract, and can be referred to arbitration. The arbitration clause survives unilateral repudiation or contentions regarding final settlement unless the contract is substituted or rendered wholly non-existent; thus, the High Court erred in dismissing the appellant's petition in toto.
- Parties
- Appellant: Damodar Valley Corporation; Respondent: K. K. Kar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 1973
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Judgment and Order Dated the 25th January, 1971 of the Calcutta High Court in Civil Rule No. 1683 of 1970
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Repudiation of Contract, Final Settlement Under Contract, Arbitration Clause and Its Survival
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damodar Valley Corporation
Appellant
K. K. Kar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Judgment and Order Dated the 25th January, 1971 of the Calcutta High Court in Civil Rule No. 1683 of 1970
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether arbitration clause perishes with the contract upon repudiation or final settlement
- 2 Whether dispute about full and final settlement is arbitrable
- 3 Extent of court's enquiry under ss. 9(b) and 33 of Arbitration Act, 1940
Ratio Decidendi
Where in a contract there is an arbitration clause, the question whether there has been a full and final settlement under the contract is itself a dispute arising 'upon' or 'in relation to' or 'in connection with' the contract, and can be referred to arbitration. The arbitration clause survives unilateral repudiation or contentions regarding final settlement unless the contract is substituted or rendered wholly non-existent; thus, the High Court erred in dismissing the appellant's petition in toto.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Subordinate Judge directed to dispose of the appellant's petition according to law
- Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment