DASHRATHBHAI TRIKAMBHAI PATEL versus HITESH MAHENDRABHAI PATEL & ANR
A cheque dishonoured will attract Section 138 only if, at the date of maturity/presentation, it represents a legally enforceable debt; part or full payments made by the drawer between drawing and presentation reduce the legally enforceable debt and must be endorsed on the cheque under Section 56 to permit negotiation of the balance, and absent such enforceable debt at presentation the drawer is not guilty under Section 138. On the facts, part-payments reduced the legally enforceable debt below the cheque amount and the accused was rightly acquitted.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel; First Respondent: Hitesh Mahendrabhai Patel
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Against Judgment of the High Court of Gujarat Dated 12 January 2022
- Legal Topics
- Section 138 NI Act, Post Dated Cheques, Endorsement Under Section 56, Statutory Notice Under Section 138
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel
Appellant
Hitesh Mahendrabhai Patel
First Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Against Judgment of the High Court of Gujarat Dated 12 January 2022
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an offence under Section 138 NI Act is made out when the cheque dishonoured does not represent a legally enforceable debt at the time of encashment
- 2 Whether part-payments made after a cheque is drawn but before presentation affect the applicability of Section 138
- 3 Whether part-payments must be endorsed on the cheque under Section 56 to permit prosecution under Section 138
Ratio Decidendi
A cheque dishonoured will attract Section 138 only if, at the date of maturity/presentation, it represents a legally enforceable debt; part or full payments made by the drawer between drawing and presentation reduce the legally enforceable debt and must be endorsed on the cheque under Section 56 to permit negotiation of the balance, and absent such enforceable debt at presentation the drawer is not guilty under Section 138. On the facts, part-payments reduced the legally enforceable debt below the cheque amount and the accused was rightly acquitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment