HAR KIRAN COMMAR versus DELHI ADMN. AND ORS.

HAR KIRAN COMMAR versus DELHI ADMN. AND ORS.

Petitioner is not entitled to relief similar to her brother as there is no evidence of quashing of land acquisition proceedings or express permission to construct; land acquisition remains valid.

Parties
Petitioner: Mrs. Har Kiran Commar; Respondents: Delhi Administration and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Review Petition (c) No. 21 of Civil Appeal No. 4656 of 1999 / Supreme Court Review Petition Following Delhi High Court Judgment Dated 17.12.96 in C.w.p. No. 920 of 1986
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Deacquisition, Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, Difference in Quashing of Land Acquisition Proceedings
Land Acquisition Deacquisition Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act Difference in Quashing of Land Acquisition Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs. Har Kiran Commar

Petitioner

Delhi Administration and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Review Petition (c) No. 21 of Civil Appeal No. 4656 of 1999 / Supreme Court Review Petition Following Delhi High Court Judgment Dated 17.12.96 in C.w.p. No. 920 of 1986

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether petitioner is entitled to relief similar to brother, Gurdip Singh Uban, based on quashing of land acquisition proceedings and permission for construction

Ratio Decidendi

Petitioner is not entitled to relief similar to her brother as there is no evidence of quashing of land acquisition proceedings or express permission to construct; land acquisition remains valid.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed.