DEEPALI GUNDU SURWASE versus KRANTI JUNIOR ADHYAPAK MAHAVIDYALAYA (D.ED.) AND OTHERS

DEEPALI GUNDU SURWASE versus KRANTI JUNIOR ADHYAPAK MAHAVIDYALAYA (D.ED.) AND OTHERS

When an employee's termination is found illegal and violative of statutory provisions and natural justice, and the employer fails to prove the employee was gainfully employed elsewhere, the employee is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages.

Parties
Appellant: Deepali Gundu Surwase; Respondents: Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed; impugned High Court order set aside; Tribunal order restored.
Legal Topics
Back Wages on Reinstatement, Suspension and Termination, Natural Justice, Service Conditions for Employees in Private Schools

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deepali Gundu Surwase

Appellant

Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Order

  1. 1 Entitlement of school teacher to back wages after illegal suspension and termination
  2. 2 Principles for award of back wages upon reinstatement for wrongful termination

Ratio Decidendi

When an employee's termination is found illegal and violative of statutory provisions and natural justice, and the employer fails to prove the employee was gainfully employed elsewhere, the employee is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; impugned High Court order set aside; Tribunal order restored.

Orders

  • Management shall pay full back wages to appellant within four months from receipt of order, failing which 9% interest per annum from suspension till actual reinstatement.
  • Non-compliance will make management liable under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.