DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER versus SYED ABDUL SALEEM AND OTHERS
Award of solatium and interest is justified on equitable grounds due to the appellant's prolonged delay (19 years) in appointing the statutory arbitrator; the precedential law consistently allows such awards in cases of extensive protraction despite statutory omissions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Defence Estate Officer; Respondents: Syed Abdul Saleem and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, Equitable Compensation, Delay in Arbitral Proceedings, Payment of Solatium and Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Defence Estate Officer
Appellant
Syed Abdul Saleem and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether solatium and interest can be awarded under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, despite the statute not providing for them
- 2 Whether the High Court was justified in enhancing compensation from Rs.6/- per sq. yard to Rs.12/- per sq. yard
- 3 Whether the High Court ignored evidence and cross-objections of the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
Award of solatium and interest is justified on equitable grounds due to the appellant's prolonged delay (19 years) in appointing the statutory arbitrator; the precedential law consistently allows such awards in cases of extensive protraction despite statutory omissions.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The award of solatium and interest along with principal compensation is confirmed.
- Appellant directed to pay costs to respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment