DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus SKIPPER CONSTRUCTLON CO. (P) LTD. AND ORS.
Purchasers under genuine agreements possess a statutory charge under Section 55(6)(b) for purchase money and interest, enforceable against the vendor and those claiming under him, including substituted security. The period of limitation for enforcing such charge is twelve years from the date the money becomes due. Where the vendor has committed fraud, he cannot rely on contractual clauses to deny payment of interest to the purchasers. Both pre and post 29.1.1991 buyers are entitled to reimbursement in full, including appropriate interest.
- Parties
- Appellant: Delhi Development Authority; Respondents: Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Disposal After Hearing Arguments and Deciding Remaining Legal Issues
- Outcome
- Petition disposed of.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Charge of Purchaser, Interest on Refund of Purchase Money, Fraud and Contractual Rights, Limitation for Enforcement of Charge, Doctrine of Lifting Corporate Veil
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Delhi Development Authority
Appellant
Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Disposal After Hearing Arguments and Deciding Remaining Legal Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether purchasers under agreements in respect of immovable property have a statutory charge under Section 55(6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 against the vendor's interest in the property
- 2 Whether such statutory charge can be enforced on substituted security if the original property is converted
- 3 Whether purchasers are entitled to interest on refunded purchase money
Ratio Decidendi
Purchasers under genuine agreements possess a statutory charge under Section 55(6)(b) for purchase money and interest, enforceable against the vendor and those claiming under him, including substituted security. The period of limitation for enforcing such charge is twelve years from the date the money becomes due. Where the vendor has committed fraud, he cannot rely on contractual clauses to deny payment of interest to the purchasers. Both pre and post 29.1.1991 buyers are entitled to reimbursement in full, including appropriate interest.
Court Disposition
Petition disposed of.
Orders
- Purchasers under agreement with Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. have a statutory charge under Section 55(6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 for the purchase money paid and interest thereon, enforceable against vendor and those claiming under him, including substituted security.
- Such purchasers are entitled to interest from date of payment until delivery or execution of sale deed, whichever is earlier.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment