DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus PUSHPENDRA KUMAR JAIN
Mere draw of lots confers no indefeasible right to allotment at the rate existing on that date; the right to the flat and applicable price arises only upon communication of the allotment-cum-demand letter. Revised land rates validly apply unless the scheme provides otherwise.
- Parties
- Appellant: Delhi Development Authority; Respondent: Pushpendra Kumar Jain
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment and order of the High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Housing Schemes, Allotment of Flats, Timing of Allotment Communication, Revision of Land Rates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Delhi Development Authority
Appellant
Pushpendra Kumar Jain
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an allottee is entitled to be charged the land rate prevailing on the date of draw of lots or the rate prevailing at the time of communication of allotment-cum-demand letter.
- 2 Whether the delay in communicating the allotment-cum-demand letter disentitles the authority from charging revised rates.
Ratio Decidendi
Mere draw of lots confers no indefeasible right to allotment at the rate existing on that date; the right to the flat and applicable price arises only upon communication of the allotment-cum-demand letter. Revised land rates validly apply unless the scheme provides otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment and order of the High Court set aside.
Orders
- High Court's order is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment