DEVENDER SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

DEVENDER SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

The demand made by the husband had no direct nexus or immediate cause for commission of suicide by the wife and thus cannot constitute abetment; prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; benefit of doubt granted to the husband.

Parties
Appellant: Devender Singh; Respondent: State of Haryana
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted.
Legal Topics
Abetment of Suicide, Dowry Demand, Benefit of Doubt, Sections 306 and 498 a IPC
Criminal Law Abetment of Suicide Dowry Demand Benefit of Doubt Sections 306 and 498 a IPC

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Devender Singh

Appellant

State of Haryana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether demand of money to raise construction amounts to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC
  2. 2 Whether such demand constitutes dowry under Section 498-A IPC

Ratio Decidendi

The demand made by the husband had no direct nexus or immediate cause for commission of suicide by the wife and thus cannot constitute abetment; prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt; benefit of doubt granted to the husband.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted.

Orders

  • Impugned judgment of the High Court and Trial Court set aside.
  • Appellant's bail bonds discharged.