DEVINDER @ KALA RAM & ORS. versus THE STATE OF HARYANA

DEVINDER @ KALA RAM & ORS. versus THE STATE OF HARYANA

Conviction under Section 304-B IPC is not sustainable as prosecution evidence (medical testimony and deceased’s statement) makes out accidental burns while cooking, rebutting presumption of dowry death. Conviction under Section 498-A IPC is sustained based on consistent evidence of dowry-related harassment by all appellants.

Parties
Appellant: Devinder @ Kala Ram; Appellant: Chand Kaur; Appellant: Roshni; Respondent: The State of Haryana
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
18 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court (special Leave Appeal Under Article 136, From High Court Judgment)
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed
Legal Topics
Dowry Death, Cruelty by Husband or Relatives, Dowry Harassment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Devinder @ Kala Ram

Appellant

Chand Kaur

Appellant

Roshni

Appellant

The State of Haryana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court (special Leave Appeal Under Article 136, From High Court Judgment)

  1. 1 Whether conviction under Section 304-B IPC for dowry death is sustainable
  2. 2 Whether conviction under Section 498-A IPC for cruelty by husband/relatives is sustainable

Ratio Decidendi

Conviction under Section 304-B IPC is not sustainable as prosecution evidence (medical testimony and deceased’s statement) makes out accidental burns while cooking, rebutting presumption of dowry death. Conviction under Section 498-A IPC is sustained based on consistent evidence of dowry-related harassment by all appellants.

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence under Section 304-B IPC set aside
  • Conviction and sentence under Section 498-A IPC sustained